Conferences - Wednesday, June 06, 2012
Mitigating the Consequences of Violent Conflict: What Works and What Does Not?
The International Expert Forum (IEF) held the second of its four meetings at IPI on June 6, 2012. The meeting, entitled “Mitigating the Consequences of Violent Conflict: What Works and What Does Not?” included over 40 policymakers, practitioners, and scholars.
IEF held its first meeting, which discussed preventive diplomacy, on December 15, 2011. The subsequent 2012 and 2013 IEF meetings will focus on peace processes, as well as peacebuilding, stability operations, and post-conflict reconstruction issues. All IEF meetings are held under the Chatham House rule of non-attribution.
The second IEF meeting considered the consequences of ongoing conflict and documented innovative means to prevent and reduce the escalation of organized violence. Scholars from the public health and social sciences are mobilizing a range of social technologies to bare witness to the consequences of armed conflict – from passive surveillance and household surveys to crowdsourcing and satellite mapping. These and other efforts give a clearer picture of human suffering in the midst of war.
Additionally, participants examined the trends and magnitudes of these challenges as identified in recent systematic empirical research. Medium- and long-term trends suggest a progressive reduction in intra- and inter-state conflicts. A wide range of reasons were put forward to explain this decline, ranging from the demise of patron-client relations following the Cold War to the increased effectiveness of multilateral peace support efforts and norms associated with the protection of civilians.
Participants also discussed lessons learned from peacekeeping operations and Special Envoys in dealing with conflict. Presently, there are more than 70 UN Special Envoys and Special Representatives active around the world. Their methods to mitigate armed conflicts involve a range of soft approaches–such as negotiation, the delivery and protection of humanitarian assistance, and the establishment of local peace zones–to outright military anti-spoiler and peace enforcement actions. These methods are often used in combination during a single conflict.
IEF is a joint collaboration between IPI, the Folk Bernadotte Academy, The SecDev Group, and the Social Science Research Council. It provides an informal venue for exchanging knowledge and experience on issues relating to conflict prevention, peacemaking, and peacebuilding. IEF is conducted on an annual basis and with a multi-year strategic vision.
The Global Observatory
After the UN Goal on Women Expires, What Happens to the Quest for Gender Parity?
With unfinished business leftover from MDG 3, how will the international community make sure equal rights for women stays on the post-2015 agenda?
Key Global Events to Watch in March
A list of key upcoming meetings and events with implications for global affairs.
2014 Top 10 Issues to Watch in Peace & Security: The Global Arena
A list of ten key issues to watch that are likely to impact international peace and security in 2014, compiled by IPI's Francesco Mancini.
The Global Observatory, produced by IPI, provides timely analysis on peace and security issues, interviews with leading policymakers, interactive maps, and more.
February 26, 2014
Roméo Dallaire: Neutralize Child Soldiers Without Destroying Them
“We believe that by better training both police and military and a whole new dimension of working much closer, particularly information-wise, with NGOs and other agencies on the ground, we can work at neutralizing without destroying children as a system of weaponry in this era,” said Lt. General Roméo Dallaire (Ret.) at an IPI event on February 26th.
February 19, 2014
Gary Bass: Forgotten Genocide May Portend Future Stain on UN Inaction
The inability of the United Nations Security Council to halt mass atrocities in East Pakistan some 40 years ago has parallels to current inaction in North Korea, argued Gary Bass, a professor of politics and international affairs at Princeton University, on February 19th.
February 18, 2014
Jok: Near Collapse in South Sudan Is Shocking but Not Surprising
The events that recently brought South Sudan to a near collapse were “extremely shocking, but they were not surprising by any means,” said Jok Madut Jok, Executive Director of The Sudd Institute, at the International Peace Institute on February 18. “It was only a matter of time before the country returned to this kind of situation,” he added.