Panel Discussions - Monday, April 26, 2010
Sudan/South Sudan: “Every Reason to Move On With a Good Process”
At an IPI event on “Postelection Sudan and the Way Forward,” Erik Solheim, Norway’s Minister of the Environment and International Development, said the stakeholders in the Sudan peace process “have every reason to move on with a good process” and “have shown ability—Bashir, Salva Kiir, and all the others—at the end of the day to find a makeable solution.”
“And we should do whatever we can, the UN and others, to assist them in that endeavor,” he added.
His references were to Omar Hassan al-Bashir, the newly reelected President of Sudan, and Salva Kiir, also reelected as the head of Southern Sudan, which is preparing to vote in January on whether to split off from the North and become its own country.
Mr. Solheim asserted that the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) which laid the groundwork for the January referendum, is a “redeeming factor” in the process, and that “we should stick to the timeline of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement, and we should not deviate from that.”
“That would be the most essential guarantee against a lot of problems,” he said.
Adonia Ayebare, Director of IPI’s Africa Program, joined Mr. Solheim in the April 26th panel discussion and said one issue with the agreement is that “we all tend to focus on the juicy issues around the CPA, which is election and referendum,” and that a main issue of the CPA has been forgotten—democratic transformation in Sudan.
“At a crucial time in history with the Sudan, when we are all concentrating on elections and the referendum… the issue of democratic transformation has not been, to me, adequately addressed by the UN, by the international community in general,” said Mr. Ayebare, who is the former Deputy Permanent Representative of Uganda to the UN.
“I think there is a danger that if we don't address them, we will hurry into having a referendum… and then we are back to square one,” he added.
Both Mr. Solheim and Mr. Ayebare agreed that the Sudanese must be the main players in determining the way forward. Said Mr. Ayebare, “I agree with the Minister that at the end of the day, it is the Sudanese stakeholders—not only the National Congress, but the SPLM, but also other stakeholders. It's their country. And I think we should make sure that their views are reflected in whatever policy sort of instruments we craft for Sudan.”
The event was moderated by Dr. Edward C. Luck, IPI Senior Vice President for Research and Programs.
The Global Observatory
Firing Blanks: The Growing Irrelevance of the UN Small Arms Process
UN momentum toward stopping illicit arms trade seems to have slowed, but national gun control laws hint at the possibility of a successful bottom-up approach.
Key Global Events to Watch in August
A list of key upcoming meetings and events with implications for global affairs.
2014 Top 10 Issues to Watch in Peace & Security: The Global Arena
A list of ten key issues to watch that are likely to impact international peace and security in 2014, compiled by IPI's Francesco Mancini.
The Global Observatory, produced by IPI, provides timely analysis on peace and security issues, interviews with leading policymakers, interactive maps, and more.
August 25, 2014
High-Level Forum Examines Lessons of 1814 and 1914 for Today
2014 marks the centenary of the outbreak of World War One and the bicentenary of the opening of the Congress of Vienna–two dates that profoundly shaped the course of history.
August 22, 2014
Real World Lessons Inform 2014 IPI Course in Negotiation, Conflict Resolution
The 2014 Advanced Course in Negotiation and Conflict Resolution, held June 22-25, led an array of international diplomats through three days of in-depth lectures, negotiation and public speaking exercises.
July 17, 2014
EU and UN Seek Ways to Improve Cooperation in Peacekeeping
The European Union is among the strongest supporters of UN peacekeeping missions around the globe, but the growing challenges faced by UN-led operations have raised the need for better EU-UN cooperation, both on the ground and at the planning level.