Panel Discussions - Friday, May 07, 2010
What Role for Internally Displaced Persons in Peace Processes?
Parties and mediators should engage with internally displaced persons throughout the peace process, said Walter Kälin, the Representative of the UN Secretary-General on the Human Rights of Internally Displaced Persons, at an IPI policy forum on May 7th.
“We do not demand that internally displaced persons have to sit at the negotiating table during 'track I' peace negotiations,” Mr. Kälin said, but “peace agreements should define who is an internally displaced person, clearly stipulate that internally displaced persons have rights, and that the parties to the agreement have obligations to them.” Peace agreements should also clarify how these provisions on internal displacement are implemented, he said.
Mr. Kälin listed several obstacles for the integration of internal displacement in peace processes and peace agreements. Displaced persons often belong to marginalized groups, which are typically not well-educated, and therefore lack an audible voice in war-torn societies. In most conflicts, they constitute a very diverse group of people, which frequently includes members of ethnic communities pitted against each other. He also noted that some displaced persons often act as spoilers in peace processes.
This policy forum marked the publication of a new report, “Integrating Internal Displacement in Peace Processes and Agreements,” as part of the Brookings-Bern Project on Internal Displacement. This report was prepared in collaboration with the UN Department of Political Affairs, and it aims at providing practical guidance to mediators in the field.
The report discusses:
(1) why internal displacement matters for making and maintaining peace;
(2) how mediators can create a framework for integrating internal displacement in peace processes;
(3) how conflict parties and mediators can engage internally displaced persons throughout the peace process; and
(4) ways to integrate the human rights and interests of internally displaced persons in a peace agreement.
Ambassador Gyan Chandra Acharya of Nepal, who chaired the event, noted in his remarks that rehabilitation measures, such as the provision of housing and social services, should not only target internally displaced persons, but also other parts of the population, in order to create an atmosphere conducive for reconciliation. He identified land disputes as a potential obstacle to the return of displaced persons, and he described the need to restore the safety and security for returnees in the entire country. When internal displacement coincides with internal migration, the registration of internally displaced persons can become difficult. The ambassador also underlined the critical importance of providing internally displaced persons with opportunities to earn a livelihood.
Udo Janz, the director of the New York office of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHCR), pointed out that in Bosnia and in other countries witnessing ethnic cleansing, displacement is not a side-effect, but rather the central objective in the armed conflict. He added that UNHCR is often in a unique position in that it maintains channels of communication to all parties. These links can be used to help integrate internal displacement in peace processes.
Teresa Whitfield, a senior adviser at the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue in Geneva and senior fellow at the Center on International Cooperation at New York University, said in her remarks that time constraints and political pressures have frequently inhibited mediators’ engagement with internally displaced persons. She concluded that the critical impact of internal displacement on peacemaking processes has not always been fully appreciated by mediators in the field. Ms. Whitfield called for an operational partnership between mediators and humanitarian officials with expert knowledge on displaced groups, in order to ensure that their interests are taken into account in the peace process.
Ambassador Acharya concluded the event by saying that peace negotiations necessarily focus on the principal actors engaged in the fighting. However, mediators should help mitigate the gap between the conflict parties and those affected by the fighting, notably displaced persons.
The event was moderated by Dr. Edward C. Luck, IPI’s Senior Vice President for Research and Programs.
The Global Observatory
Year in Review: Top 10 Peace and Security Reads
The International Peace Institute and its Global Observatory offered research and analysis on a range of topics in peace and security in 2014.
Key Global Events to Watch in December
A list of key upcoming meetings and events with implications for global affairs.
2014 Top 10 Issues to Watch in Peace & Security: The Global Arena
A list of ten key issues to watch that are likely to impact international peace and security in 2014, compiled by IPI's Francesco Mancini.
The Global Observatory, produced by IPI, provides timely analysis on peace and security issues, interviews with leading policymakers, interactive maps, and more.
December 15, 2014
Fathi: Iran and the Struggle Between Hardliners and Reformers
Discussing her new book The Lonely War: One Woman’s Account of the Struggle for Modern Iran at IPI on December 15th, author Nazila Fathi said that 35 years after the revolution, Iran is divided between hardliners and a large moderate middle class, but admitted that it is still unclear which of the two sides will gain the upper hand.
December 12, 2014
Effective Governance Key to Africa’s Rise
Good governance is the key to Africa’s rise, but structural challenges are pulling the continent back, according to a new report launched at a December 12th IPI policy forum entitled “Effective Governance in Challenging Environments.”
December 09, 2014
Small States in a Multilateral World
Despite their size and limited resources, small states have an important and crucial role to play in the multilateral system and can leverage their power through cooperation.
September 25, 2014
IPI Remembers Margaret Vogt