Panel Discussions - Tuesday, July 13, 2010
A Proposal for the Future of Jerusalem’s Old City
Three former Canadian diplomats with extensive experience in the Middle East have spent six years developing a formula for the passionately contested final status of Jerusalem’s Old City, and on July 13, they came to IPI to present their findings.
The three, Michael Bell, Michael J. Molloy and John Bell, developed the project at the University of Windsor in Ontario and they circulated a 131-page booklet outlining in great detail their proposal, which is known as The Jerusalem Old City Project.
Their study departs from the traditionally heavy focus on sovereignty and explores instead a special regime for Jerusalem whereby governance of the Old City would be overseen a joint body of Israelis and Palestinians and managed by a third party commissioner appointed by the two countries. By definition, it could come into effect only after the adoption of a two-state solution.
Speaking before a projected map of the Old City, each of the three authors talked about the sensitivities of working in the context of competing historical claims to the Old City and the challenge of producing a formula which might gain the support of both Israelis and Palestinians.
Michael J. Molloy: “Our proposal starts out with the idea that the special regime has to come out of the treaty between the two peoples. It can’t be imposed from the outside. It can’t be dropped in by the U.N. or anybody else. It’s gotta’ be organic to their peace process.”
John Bell: “We don’t say a lot about sovereignty and that’s intentional. Our own view, debatable, is that our proposal is sovereignty-neutral, meaning it could be applied under a situation of divided sovereignty of the Old City, deferred sovereignty or no agreement whatsoever. That’s our view. Others have debated us on this. They say that what we’re proposing does have implications and in that sense, very frankly, considering this special regime may not be the first choice of either Israelis or Palestinians. It could be a good fallback should sovereignty prove to be a massively difficult issue as it was in 2000.”
Michael Bell: “It is the holy site for Jews, and nothing’s going to change that just as it is a holy site – a very important holy site for Muslims, and nothing’s going to change that belief, which is deeply embedded in the cultural, social, historic, geopolitical and mystical consciousness of both parties.”
The discussion was moderated by Warren Hoge, IPI’s Vice President for External Relations.
The Global Observatory
Key Global Events to Watch in September
A list of key upcoming meetings and events with implications for global affairs.
2014 Top 10 Issues to Watch in Peace & Security: The Global Arena
A list of ten key issues to watch that are likely to impact international peace and security in 2014, compiled by IPI's Francesco Mancini.
The Global Observatory, produced by IPI, provides timely analysis on peace and security issues, interviews with leading policymakers, interactive maps, and more.
August 25, 2014
High-Level Forum Examines Lessons of 1814 and 1914 for Today
2014 marks the centenary of the outbreak of World War One and the bicentenary of the opening of the Congress of Vienna–two dates that profoundly shaped the course of history.
August 05, 2014
Accra Meeting Examines Effective Governance in Challenging Environments
Despite undeniable progress, the continuous peace and security reverses witnessed across Africa illustrate the persistent gap that exists between aspirational good governance norms and principles and their actual implementation.
July 17, 2014
EU and UN Seek Ways to Improve Cooperation in Peacekeeping
The European Union is among the strongest supporters of UN peacekeeping missions around the globe, but the growing challenges faced by UN-led operations have raised the need for better EU-UN cooperation, both on the ground and at the planning level.