IPI HomeEventsPanel DiscussionsMali Topic of Graduate Student Conflict Assessment Hosted by IPI

 

print print  |  share share back back


Image credit: VOA

Panel Discussions - Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Mali Topic of Graduate Student Conflict Assessment Hosted by IPI

The resignation of Mali’s Prime Minister Cheick Modibo Diarra was another twist in an ever-changing crisis and coincidently happened on the same day as IPI’s informal conflict assessment exercise on Mali: December 11, 2012.

For the exercise, IPI invited graduate students from New York University and Columbia University to apply their assessment skills on situations that are on the Security Council agenda.

The power struggle between the different actors in Mali is one of the main sources of the political gridlock, be it al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb’s (AQIM) struggle for control over the north, or the Tuareg and Ansar Dine’s plight for autonomy from the Malian government. Mali’s corrupt government has created a bitter civil society that is disillusioned by patronage politics and lack of economic opportunities. This has culminated into a powerless local government and a struggle for local autonomy. Any analysis should therefore take into account national and local actors’ greed and grievances—past and present—to make sense of the changing dynamics between groups; no real progress can be made if so many actors’ competing needs and expectations are left unattended.

The Tuareg groups, for example, perceive themselves as marginalized, unequal, impoverished, and ill represented in government. Such long-standing grievances have resulted in a whole new layer of present greed that continues to divide society and create new sources of confrontation between groups: AQIM tries to dominate the north through a Sharia ideological base while also operating illicit markets of human trafficking and drug cartels; Ansar Dine continues vying for power in the north; while the Movement for Unity and Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO) uses the chaos to politicize ethnicity and turn groups against each other.

In identifying such trends, it can be helpful to hypothesize future and potential grievances. As more areas become governed by Sharia law, social ills such as forced marriage, rape, and recruitment of child soldiers increase dramatically. At the same time, there seems to be an emerging re-marginalization of the Tuareg National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad (MNLA) as they are pushed out by AQIM. It is therefore useful to think of how grievances change as things reconsolidate and the situation takes on a new form.

These trends should be considered as the Security Council plans a military intervention to bring stability to the region, though the debate continues as to whether such an approach is the best way forward. Will the international community be willing to fund such an operation, given the state of the global economy? Is targeting groups a viable option, considering that many of them–particular the Tuaregs–are heavily assimilated within civilian quarters? Will the intervention take place along simultaneous diplomatic efforts, or would such negotiations be hampered as a result of an ensuing military affair? How can the intervention ensure a long-term sustainable peace?

Given that the center is weak and fragmented, the Malian government is struggling to bring order to their internal affairs thus rendering the success of a military operation highly questionable. At the same time, diplomatic efforts are no longer proving sufficient because various actors, particularly those in control of the north, are not willing to engage in a dialogue which warrants a more aggressive military approach.

The conflict-assessment discussion suggested that the approach to the Malian crisis has lacked creativity. The following suggestions were put forward:

1. Inclusive dialogue as a capacity for peace: The discussion called on civil society, youth, and women to play a more direct role in peacemaking, ideally through the creation of new non-violent groups that would not be led by the international community.

2. Incentives and disincentives: Are there incentives or disincentives that can modify the behavior of key actors? For example, by appealing to Ansar Dine’s business mentality, is there a way forward by luring them towards commerce? And what disincentives could shift the relationship between actors?

3. Religion: Is there a way to reverse how Sharia law is being used negatively for political means? How can religion be used in a more positive way?

The way forward in Mali is far from clear. Two imperative points need to be taken into account: whatever force is deployed in the region, the nature of an intervention must be distinctly a Malian affair. In other words, the international community’s role is first and foremost to offer support to the Malian population. Secondly, a sense of prioritization needs to be established: the highest priority is the dire humanitarian situation that, so far, has left 400,000 displaced and caused massive food insecurity. Other short-term objectives must be to lengthen the peace negotiations between the MNLA and Ansar Dine as a means to facilitate disarmament.

The Global Observatory

In Light of Scottish Referendum, What Future for Frustrated Secessionists?
As secessionist movements proliferate around the world, a look at what leads some to succeed and others to fail.

Key Global Events to Watch in September
A list of key upcoming meetings and events with implications for global affairs.

2014 Top 10 Issues to Watch in Peace & Security: The Global Arena
A list of ten key issues to watch that are likely to impact international peace and security in 2014, compiled by IPI's Francesco Mancini.

The Global Observatory, produced by IPI, provides timely analysis on peace and security issues, interviews with leading policymakers, interactive maps, and more.

Recent Events

September 25, 2014
Estonian President: Russia’s Actions Threaten International System
On September 25th, President Toomas Hendrik Ilves of Estonia warned that Russia’s recent aggression in Ukraine is a threat to the norms of the international system as we know them, and that it may lead to a drastic reassessment of foreign policy priorities in Europe.

September 22, 2014
Kevin Rudd, Former Australian PM, to Chair Independent Commission on Multilateralism
Kevin Rudd, former Prime Minister of Australia, will chair the newly launched Independent Commission on Multilateralism (ICM). The Commission will be co-chaired by Børge Brende, Foreign Minister of Norway, and John Baird, Foreign Minister of Canada.

September 22, 2014
IPI Hosts Ministers, Officials at Annual Mideast Dinner
On Monday, September 22nd, IPI held its Ninth Ministerial Dinner on the Middle East in its Trygve Lie Center for Peace, Security, and Development. The working dinner saw the participation of foreign ministers and other high-level representatives from the Middle East and North Africa, Europe, and beyond.

View More