Speaker Events - Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Mousavian: Do Not Deny Iran's Legitimate Rights
“If you are going to deny Iran its legitimate rights to enjoy peaceful technologies—chemical, biological, and nuclear—then what would be the reason for Iran to stay a member of chemical, biological, and nuclear conventions? Only commitments, no rights?” asked Seyed Hossein Mousavian, at a Beyond the Headlines event at IPI on June 26, 2012.
Mr. Mousavian served as spokesman for Iran’s nuclear negotiating team between 2003 and 2005 under President Mohammad Khatami and he is now a Research Scholar at Princeton University after falling out with the current Iranian government of President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad. He was speaking about his newly-published book, The Iranian Nuclear Crisis: A Memoir, in which he gives an insider’s perspective of negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program.
“Ninety percent of my book is explaining the Iranian perspective,” he said. “As long as you don’t understand the perspective of the other side of negotiation, the other point of view, how can you find a solution?”
He said that the key question to ask is, “Is the current status quo because of Iranian intentions or Western policies?” Sketching a historical perspective of Iran’s nuclear program, he said, “I believe the West pushed Iran to this situation.”
“The United States of America laid the foundation of a nuclear Iran, not clerics,” he said, explaining that the United States helped build Iran’s nuclear program beginning in the 1960s under Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi’s government. The “core issue” in today’s crisis, he said, is Iranian intentions about a nuclear bomb.
The Iran-Iraq war, he said, “changed Iranian security calculations, totally. It made Iran no other option to build up its military capability, nuclear capability to deter any further aggression, either by neighbors or by Western countries.”
Today, he said, “Iran has 15 neighbors. The United States of America is in the border of 12 countries around Iran. Believe me, Iran does not feel a threat about any of its neighbors…Iranians, they believe the US military presence in the Persian Gulf, in Pakistan, in Afghanistan, in Saudi Arabia, everywhere surrounding Iran with always threatening Iran.”
“The fact is economic war against Iran has already begun. Intelligence war, covert war, cyber war already has begun. I don’t see serious debates in the media in the US about possible consequences about these dimensions,” he said. “Iran is the most-sanctioned country in the world while it has not a single nuclear bomb.”
“The West needs to stop double standards. Double standards…to have strategic relations with countries that have nuclear bombs, they are not members of the NPT, and put all the sanctions of the world on a country which doesn’t have a nuclear bomb, and is a member of the NPT,” he said.
Elaborating further on sanctions, he said, “My problem is that sanctions are hurting the ordinary people. This is a revenge from Iranian nation. That is why I have always been against sanctions. The sanctions radicalize the Iranian domestic situation, and radicalize the Iranian position. This is something the West does not understand. They think sanctions are working, and Iran would give up. It’s not the case.”
“Iran-US relations are a major factor. That’s why I have been proposing a dual package,” he said. “One package for the nuclear to be discussed between Iran and the P5+1, and one package between Iran and the US on all bilateral, regional, international issues to revive Iran-US relations, but a new relation based on non-interference and mutual respect.”
“Regime change is not going to happen. Definitely it’s not going to happen,” he said. “Even if you have regime change in Iran, there would be no change in Iranian nuclear policy,” continuing that he believed Iran does not want to build a nuclear bomb, citing a fatwa the government issued declaring nuclear weapons un-Islamic.
“Rather than asking Iran elements which is in contrary with the NPT would be a mistake. Do not challenge the rights of a nation. It’s not going to happen,” he said. “As a long-term solution is nuclear-free zone in the Middle East. A WMD-free zone in the Middle East, even better.”
The event was moderated by Warren Hoge, IPI Senior Adviser on External Relations.
The Global Observatory
The Houthi Takeover in Yemen: How Did We Get Here?
Three important factors help us understand how Yemen got to the current situation.
Key Global Events to Watch in January
A list of key upcoming meetings and events with implications for global affairs.
2015: Ten Multilateral Events to Watch This Year
A list of ten events that are likely to impact international peace and security in 2015, compiled by IPI’s Francesco Mancini.
The Global Observatory, produced by IPI, provides timely analysis on peace and security issues, interviews with leading policymakers, interactive maps, and more.
January 20, 2015
Mongolian Foreign Policy Between ''Two Giants''
On January 20, Mongolia’s new Foreign Minister Purevsuren Lundeg visited the IPI Vienna office and gave an informal briefing on Mongolia’s contemporary foreign policy priorities and challenges.
January 20, 2015
Dutch FM Koenders: ''The Security Council Has to Change''
Speaking to an overflow IPI audience on January 20th, Dutch Foreign Minister Bert Koenders acknowledged how far the United Nations has come since its inception 70 years ago but said that the organization still “has a lot of growing up to do.”
December 15, 2014
Fathi: Iran and the Struggle Between Hardliners and Reformers
Discussing her new book The Lonely War: One Woman’s Account of the Struggle for Modern Iran at IPI on December 15th, author Nazila Fathi said that 35 years after the revolution, Iran is divided between hardliners and a large moderate middle class, but admitted that it is still unclear which of the two sides will gain the upper hand.
September 25, 2014
IPI Remembers Margaret Vogt