Speaker Events - Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Mousavian: Do Not Deny Iran's Legitimate Rights
“If you are going to deny Iran its legitimate rights to enjoy peaceful technologies—chemical, biological, and nuclear—then what would be the reason for Iran to stay a member of chemical, biological, and nuclear conventions? Only commitments, no rights?” asked Seyed Hossein Mousavian, at a Beyond the Headlines event at IPI on June 26, 2012.
Mr. Mousavian served as spokesman for Iran’s nuclear negotiating team between 2003 and 2005 under President Mohammad Khatami and he is now a Research Scholar at Princeton University after falling out with the current Iranian government of President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad. He was speaking about his newly-published book, The Iranian Nuclear Crisis: A Memoir, in which he gives an insider’s perspective of negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program.
“Ninety percent of my book is explaining the Iranian perspective,” he said. “As long as you don’t understand the perspective of the other side of negotiation, the other point of view, how can you find a solution?”
He said that the key question to ask is, “Is the current status quo because of Iranian intentions or Western policies?” Sketching a historical perspective of Iran’s nuclear program, he said, “I believe the West pushed Iran to this situation.”
“The United States of America laid the foundation of a nuclear Iran, not clerics,” he said, explaining that the United States helped build Iran’s nuclear program beginning in the 1960s under Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi’s government. The “core issue” in today’s crisis, he said, is Iranian intentions about a nuclear bomb.
The Iran-Iraq war, he said, “changed Iranian security calculations, totally. It made Iran no other option to build up its military capability, nuclear capability to deter any further aggression, either by neighbors or by Western countries.”
Today, he said, “Iran has 15 neighbors. The United States of America is in the border of 12 countries around Iran. Believe me, Iran does not feel a threat about any of its neighbors…Iranians, they believe the US military presence in the Persian Gulf, in Pakistan, in Afghanistan, in Saudi Arabia, everywhere surrounding Iran with always threatening Iran.”
“The fact is economic war against Iran has already begun. Intelligence war, covert war, cyber war already has begun. I don’t see serious debates in the media in the US about possible consequences about these dimensions,” he said. “Iran is the most-sanctioned country in the world while it has not a single nuclear bomb.”
“The West needs to stop double standards. Double standards…to have strategic relations with countries that have nuclear bombs, they are not members of the NPT, and put all the sanctions of the world on a country which doesn’t have a nuclear bomb, and is a member of the NPT,” he said.
Elaborating further on sanctions, he said, “My problem is that sanctions are hurting the ordinary people. This is a revenge from Iranian nation. That is why I have always been against sanctions. The sanctions radicalize the Iranian domestic situation, and radicalize the Iranian position. This is something the West does not understand. They think sanctions are working, and Iran would give up. It’s not the case.”
“Iran-US relations are a major factor. That’s why I have been proposing a dual package,” he said. “One package for the nuclear to be discussed between Iran and the P5+1, and one package between Iran and the US on all bilateral, regional, international issues to revive Iran-US relations, but a new relation based on non-interference and mutual respect.”
“Regime change is not going to happen. Definitely it’s not going to happen,” he said. “Even if you have regime change in Iran, there would be no change in Iranian nuclear policy,” continuing that he believed Iran does not want to build a nuclear bomb, citing a fatwa the government issued declaring nuclear weapons un-Islamic.
“Rather than asking Iran elements which is in contrary with the NPT would be a mistake. Do not challenge the rights of a nation. It’s not going to happen,” he said. “As a long-term solution is nuclear-free zone in the Middle East. A WMD-free zone in the Middle East, even better.”
The event was moderated by Warren Hoge, IPI Senior Adviser on External Relations.
The Global Observatory
Nelson Mandela: Man and Awesome Phenomenon
A former member of the South African Parliament reflects on Mandela's warmth and generosity.
Ordinary Fears, Extraordinary Man: The Legacy of Nelson Mandela
As a young South African diplomat during the apartheid-to-democracy transition, Cedric de Coning witnessed the humility and power of a flawed statesman.
Key Global Events to Watch in December
A list of key upcoming meetings and events with implications for global affairs.
Top 10 Issues to Watch in 2013: The Multilateral Arena
Ten key issues that are likely to impact global affairs in international peace, security, and development.
The Global Observatory, produced by IPI, provides timely analysis on peace and security issues, interviews with leading policymakers, interactive maps, and more.
December 02, 2013
Latin America Focus of Fourth ''Being a Peacekeeper'' Event
On December 2-3, IPI brought together 24 representatives from eleven Latin American countries with senior officials from the UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and the Department of Field Support to discuss the current state—as well as the future—of Latin American military and police contributions to UN peacekeeping operations.
November 28, 2013
Energy and Security in the Arctic: A New “Frozen” Conflict?
Is the Arctic a “region of cooperation,” or will competition for its potentially rich energy resources lead to conflict in the high north? This was the main question addressed during an expert workshop held in The Hague on November 28th by the International Peace Institute together with the International Gas Union and the Clingendael International Energy Programme.
November 22, 2013
Can Technology Play a Role in Drafting a Constitution?
The effects that new technologies can have on constitutional processes was the topic of this November 22nd IPI roundtable discussion. Approximately five new constitutions are written around the world every year, and their legitimacy is increasingly influenced by a new level of public participation in their drafting, not merely by a plebiscite on the final text. As rapidly advancing technology changes the way that governments and citizens interact, what role are new technologies playing in constitutions?