Speaker Events - Wednesday, June 27, 2012
IAEA’s Mrabit: “Better to Prevent Than Mitigate”
“Our cooperation approach with states is global and systematic; together with states we do not want to wait until a disaster occurs,” Khammar Mrabit, Director of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) Office of Nuclear Security, told an IPI lunchtime forum on June 27, 2012. “That is why, with states receiving IAEA assistance, we have what we call national Integrated Nuclear Security Support Plans (INSSPs) that consolidate individual nuclear security needs and priorities of states, and also provide customized frameworks for coordinating and implementing nuclear security activities conducted by the recipient states concerned, the IAEA and potential donors. Such plans cover all the areas of prevention, detection and response to have an adequate nuclear security infrastructure.” For nuclear security, he said, “It’s better to prevent rather than mitigate. So prevention is one important principle of nuclear security.”
Mr. Mrabit provided an overview of the IAEA’s nuclear security program, and explained how the IAEA assists states to achieve nuclear security through establishing global guidance and standards and providing for their application.
“Our cooperation approach to nuclear security is holistic and systematic,” he said. “We establish, with states receiving IAEA assistance, an INSSP. Such plans include what should be done by the country, what should be done by the IAEA, and together we implement such plans.”
Nuclear and other radioactive materials have many beneficial peaceful applications. And radioactive material is found in every country on earth, Mr. Mrabit said, but such material needs to be controlled and protected to prevent harmful uses in crime and terrorism. “The risk is there, the risk is real and global,” he said.
“Nuclear security is the responsibility of states. It is the responsibility of states to protect their people, society and the environment against malicious acts. Our role is to work together with states to help them establish and maintain good nuclear security infrastructure by helping them to have guidance, by providing expertise, by training their people, and also by assisting them to adhere and implement international instruments and conventions that would help globally improve nuclear security. What we do is part of something bigger, what we call the 'global nuclear security framework,'” he said.
Complacency also creates risks, he said. “States that are complacent, who believe there is no problem—that is when the real problem starts.”
“States that do not have any preventive action because they believe they do not have nuclear or other radioactive material; any state on earth has radioactive material used for medical, industrial and other practices... the problem is the problem of everybody if such material is not well protected and controlled. It is a global issue.”
Since 1995, there have been 2242 incidents involving nuclear security as collected by the IAEA’s Illicit Trafficking Database based on information provided or confirmed by states, Mr. Mrabit explained, underscoring the importance of the issue. He cited the example of highly enriched uranium seized in Moldova in June 2011, and other examples in Bulgaria in 1999, Slovakia in 2007, and Georgia in 2010.
Despite all the work the IAEA and other actors are doing, challenges remain, including the lack of a fully functioning global framework, and in getting states to implement IAEA guidance and standards. There is greater recognition, however, of the importance of nuclear security today and of the IAEA's leading role in tackling it, he said. “I’m very happy to see very many people here aware of what’s going on and willing to talk more about this.”
“Countries have been using more and more [IAEA] recommendations even if they are not mandatory,” he said. “All countries realize the importance of such guidance and standards from the International Atomic Energy Agency, and they are asking the IAEA to come and assess the effectiveness of their physical protection systems,” including countries with established and advanced nuclear programs such as the United States, France, China, etc.
“Although our guidance and standards are not mandatory, they are becoming more and more "de facto" the norm,” he concluded.
Dr. Geoffrey Shaw, the Representative of the IAEA Director General to the United Nations provided introductory remarks.
The event was moderated by IPI Senior Adviser for External Relations, Warren Hoge.
The Global Observatory
Aid Workers, More on the Front Lines, Suffer Increased Attacks: Interview with Abby Stoddard
Aid worker attacks were at their highest levels last year.
Key Global Events to Watch in March
A list of key upcoming meetings and events with implications for global affairs.
2014 Top 10 Issues to Watch in Peace & Security: The Global Arena
A list of ten key issues to watch that are likely to impact international peace and security in 2014, compiled by IPI's Francesco Mancini.
The Global Observatory, produced by IPI, provides timely analysis on peace and security issues, interviews with leading policymakers, interactive maps, and more.
February 26, 2014
Roméo Dallaire: Neutralize Child Soldiers Without Destroying Them
“We believe that by better training both police and military and a whole new dimension of working much closer, particularly information-wise, with NGOs and other agencies on the ground, we can work at neutralizing without destroying children as a system of weaponry in this era,” said Lt. General Roméo Dallaire (Ret.) at an IPI event on February 26th.
February 19, 2014
Gary Bass: Forgotten Genocide May Portend Future Stain on UN Inaction
The inability of the United Nations Security Council to halt mass atrocities in East Pakistan some 40 years ago has parallels to current inaction in North Korea, argued Gary Bass, a professor of politics and international affairs at Princeton University, on February 19th.
February 18, 2014
Jok: Near Collapse in South Sudan Is Shocking but Not Surprising
The events that recently brought South Sudan to a near collapse were “extremely shocking, but they were not surprising by any means,” said Jok Madut Jok, Executive Director of The Sudd Institute, at the International Peace Institute on February 18. “It was only a matter of time before the country returned to this kind of situation,” he added.
December 03, 2013
IPI Editor Adam Lupel Quoted on the Politics of Genocide [IRIN News]