Panel Discussions - Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Compelling Non-State Armed Groups to Comply with Humanitarian Law
“All of today’s conflicts involve one or more non-state actors — groups whose political and military objectives are extensively analyzed but, if we are honest, we do not really know well,” said John Holmes, UN Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator, in his opening remarks at an IPI event on July 20th. “At the same time, their knowledge of and respect for their obligations under international humanitarian law is too often poor, and, at worst, non-existent.”
Several panelists during the event echoed the call by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon for a comprehensive approach to induce compliance from such groups with international humanitarian and human rights’ laws and norms. Such an approach should be underpinned by impartiality and neutrality and employ a variety of tools ranging from dialogue and negotiation to training and monitoring of compliance. In his May 2009 report to the Security Council on the protection of civilians (S/2009/277), the Secretary-General argued that there is an urgent need for international actors to develop a comprehensive strategy to enhance non state armed groups’ compliance with international humanitarian law (IHL) and international human rights law (IHRL).
“That is the challenge for our discussion today – how to engage with these groups,” Mr. Holmes said. “We need to remind them of their obligations and make sure they understand them, and the possible consequences of not abiding by them. We need to assess their capacity to enforce appropriate conduct, and learn what beliefs and motivations drive their behavior towards civilians – both positively and negatively. In other words, if we are serious about reducing the risks for civilians, we need urgently to develop a comprehensive approach towards improving compliance by all these groups with the law.”
“NGOs and inter-governmental organizations have respective strengths and weaknesses and more or less latitude given the sensitivity of the subject,” said Elisabeth Decrey Warner, President and Co-founder of Geneva Call, a Swiss-based NGO whose mission is to engage with non state armed groups to promote their compliance with IHL and IHRL. “We can learn how to leverage these comparative advantages in order to best achieve the protection of civilians.”
The event, titled “Humanitarian Engagement with Non-State Armed Groups: Enhancing the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict,” was hosted by Geneva Call, the International Peace Institute (IPI), and the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). Benefiting from the support of the Permanent Mission of Switzerland to the UN, this dialogue attracted nearly 90 member state representatives, UN Secretariat officials, NGO leaders, and members of the broader policy community.
The meeting was conducted under the Chatham House Rule of non-attribution, but some of the presenters agreed to share their remarks, which are linked below.
Agenda
Remarks by Sayed Aqa, UN Resident Coordinator and UNDP Resident Representative in Bahrain
Remarks by Louise-Georges Arsenault, UNICEF
Remarks by Sir John Holmes, OCHA
The Global Observatory
Interview with John Prendergast, Co-Founder, Enough Project
Mr. Prendergast discusses the international justice system and the new ground forged by Invisible Children's Kony2012 campaign.
Key Global Events to Watch in May
A list of key upcoming meetings and events with implications for global affairs.
The Global Observatory is a new website by IPI, providing timely analysis on peace and security issues, interviews with leading policymakers, interactive maps, and more.
Recent Events
May 10, 2012
Arbour: What the Rule of Law Means
“In my understanding of the rule of law, fundamentally, what the rule of law means is that it embraces the principle of equality before the law,” Louise Arbour, president of the International Crisis Group (ICG), told an IPI audience on May 10, 2012. Ms. Arbour outlined that this means that no one is above the law and everyone has both equal protection and equal benefit of the law. 
May 03, 2012
Shachtman: Cyber Threats Akin to South Bronx, Not Pearl Harbor
“There’s not a danger of a cyber Pearl Harbor… it’s more like the South Bronx circa 1999, where there’s a danger that it becomes such a tough neighborhood that no one wants to set up shop there and people move out,” Noah Shachtman, editor of the Danger Room blog at Wired magazine and non-resident fellow at the Brookings Institution, told an IPI audience at a panel on cyber security on May 3, 2011.
April 27, 2012
Preventing Conflicts in Africa: The Role of Early Warning and Response Systems
An April 27th roundtable discussion at IPI titled “Preventing Conflicts in Africa: The Role of Early Warning and Response Systems” examined the progress, prospects and challenges of regional and international early warning and response mechanisms to monitor, anticipate, and mitigate potential conflict situations in Africa.