Speaker Events - Saturday, July 25, 2009
France’s Brice Lalonde: Countering Climate Change Needs Joint Action and Vision of Future
Brice Lalonde, Special Ambassador of France for the Climate Change Negotiation, discussed at IPI the current state of play in climate change talks in the lead-up to the UN conference on the subject in Copenhagen in December.
At the time of his talk, on June 25, 2009, Lalonde had just returned from a meeting of the Major Economies Forum in Mexico.
Here are edited excerpts from his presentation. You can download the full transcript here.
The Copenhagen Meeting: It’s a huge task, as you know, because we understand it’s completely reshuffling the world economy. It’s very technical, very complex, and it’s left to negotiators, which is a mistake. So heads of state have to [grab hold] of it, because the negotiators otherwise are going to steal the whole process and make it too complicated.
Goals: We know what the goal should be. Everybody knows, in 2050, we have to reduce by 50 percent globally all our emissions, and we know that for developed countries, it must be 80 percent. The task is 80 percent reduction by 2050 for all developed countries, which would mean a global reduction of 50 percent…It’s not, of course, easy to do, but this is what we have to do….That means that in 2025, for instance, in all countries of the world, emissions have to decline. Everybody sort of agrees with that.
The need for everybody to act: Some countries still believe that they will only act if they are paid to act, which of course is not the way to see things. Everybody has to do something [to counter] climate change, and once everybody does (because everybody’s threatened by climate change), we will see how we can help each other. It’s not a situation where developed countries would be asking other countries to do something. Everybody has to do something, and slowly, this idea has trickled down.
Who’s responsible? That’s one of the problems we have, and coming from Mexico––where we had a Major Economies Forum––it was quite interesting to see [how we may look] for a center to find order from chaos. For instance, one delegation said, for the long-term goal, “Let’s ask the scientists.” So there is that sort of confusion: where politicians don’t know how to handle the scientific data, and, in fact, it’s not up to the scientists to tell people what to do. Rather, it’s the politicians who have the responsibility to say, “Okay, this is what we’re going to do.” And then we have no center in the sense that we don’t have a benevolent, neutral body, which would set a road map for every country and say, “This is what I suggest, I’m neutral.” No, it comes from each country, 190 countries which would give submissions, and we hope that the truth or the real thing will come out from that.
What will the future look like? This brings me to what I think is one of the most difficult problems: we don’t have an image of the future. We don’t have an image of a desirable, low-carbon future. How would it be? What would the day of Mr. Jones in the UK, or somebody in Africa, in 2060 living in a low-carbon society look like? How would we be living? How would we be producing? Nobody knows. This is very important in my view, because in history, all movements, all big steps, were always taken by people who thought that tomorrow would be better than today, and that you could accept some difficulties today because it’s going to be better tomorrow, and they had an image of how it would be tomorrow. We don’t have that.
The European Union: I’m not allowed to talk on behalf of the European Union today, but I mean, we are quite happy because we have made a very strong decision by adopting a climate energy package. Twenty-seven countries, very different, some twice as rich as others, some completely coal dependent, some, I would say, nuclear dependent, and nevertheless, we got it, and we have the solidarity systems, money flowing from rich countries to less rich countries: different systems, which in our view, can be a model.
France: So we try in France to build some sort of an alliance, to bring the voice of Africa and of the small islands into the negotiation and to try to help them, because that’s the main problem which is also going to face us: food security and survival, in countries that are going to become much more arid.
The Global Observatory
South Sudan, Back in Crisis, Finds Advocates in Former Child Refugees
Two former child soldiers from Sudan discuss how they are working to provide assistance to the South Sudanese displaced by the conflict that began December 15.
Key Global Events to Watch in March
A list of key upcoming meetings and events with implications for global affairs.
2014 Top 10 Issues to Watch in Peace & Security: The Global Arena
A list of ten key issues to watch that are likely to impact international peace and security in 2014, compiled by IPI's Francesco Mancini.
The Global Observatory, produced by IPI, provides timely analysis on peace and security issues, interviews with leading policymakers, interactive maps, and more.
February 26, 2014
Roméo Dallaire: Neutralize Child Soldiers Without Destroying Them
“We believe that by better training both police and military and a whole new dimension of working much closer, particularly information-wise, with NGOs and other agencies on the ground, we can work at neutralizing without destroying children as a system of weaponry in this era,” said Lt. General Roméo Dallaire (Ret.) at an IPI event on February 26th.
February 19, 2014
Gary Bass: Forgotten Genocide May Portend Future Stain on UN Inaction
The inability of the United Nations Security Council to halt mass atrocities in East Pakistan some 40 years ago has parallels to current inaction in North Korea, argued Gary Bass, a professor of politics and international affairs at Princeton University, on February 19th.
February 18, 2014
Jok: Near Collapse in South Sudan Is Shocking but Not Surprising
The events that recently brought South Sudan to a near collapse were “extremely shocking, but they were not surprising by any means,” said Jok Madut Jok, Executive Director of The Sudd Institute, at the International Peace Institute on February 18. “It was only a matter of time before the country returned to this kind of situation,” he added.